Pre-launch — Gluecron is in final validation. Public signups and git hosting for non-owner users open after launch review.
CodeIssuesDiscussionsWikiPull RequestsProjectsCommitsActionsReleasesContributorsPulse● GatesSecuritySettingsDeploymentsPipelineInsightsAgents✨ Explain✨ Ask AI✨ Workspace✨ Spec✨ Tests▓ Debt Map✨ NL Search🏛 Archaeology
claude/adoring-hopper-5x74bqclaude/affectionate-feynman-ykrf1hclaude/architecture-audit-design-wxprenclaude/build-status-update-3MXsfclaude/charming-meitner-mllb5rclaude/compare-gate-gluecron-s4mFQclaude/confident-faraday-tikcwbclaude/continue-work-XMTlIclaude/crontech-gluecron-deploy-7MIECclaude/crontech-platform-setup-SeKfwclaude/design-2026claude/ecstatic-ptolemy-jMdigclaude/enhance-github-integration-QNHdGclaude/fix-aa-loop-issue-PonMQclaude/fix-actions-and-processclaude/fix-desktop-errors-XqoW8claude/fix-red-workflowsclaude/fix-website-access-6FKJNclaude/gatetest-integration-hardeningclaude/github-audit-improvements-bDFr9claude/gluecron-launch-status-FoMRlclaude/hopeful-lamport-olfCTclaude/issue-to-pr-and-protectionsclaude/jolly-heisenberg-2sg1Qclaude/launch-preparation-QmTb6claude/new-session-xk1l7claude/plan-platform-architecture-kkN4yclaude/platform-analysis-roadmap-1nUGLclaude/platform-launch-assessment-8dWV8claude/polish-platform-release-AeDrUclaude/resume-previous-work-KzyLwclaude/review-crontech-handoff-qYEVqclaude/review-project-completeness-lHhS2claude/review-readme-docs-ulqPKclaude/serene-edison-rj87weclaude/setup-multi-repo-dev-BCwNQclaude/ship-fixes-and-tests-Jvz1cclaude/site-audit-competitive-pctlwgclaude/site-migration-vercel-XstpKclaude/standalone-product-repos-XHFTDcopilot/feat-smart-empty-states-keyboard-first-enhancementcopilot/feat-smart-morning-digest-review-context-restorecopilot/fix-and-process-workflowscopilot/update-ai-powered-code-reviewfeat/debt-mapfeat/push-policy-codeowners-hardeningfeat/smart-digest-contextfeat/stage-impactfeat/t1-secret-migrationfeat/u-polishfeat/w-self-hostfeat/w2-claude-configfix/agent-journey-orphan-sweepgatetest/auto-fix-1776586424172gatetest/auto-fix-1776586534814gatetest/auto-fix-1776590685143gatetest/auto-fix-1776590808199mainops/redeploy-retriggerstyle/dxt-cta-themeworktree-agent-a3377aad30d55da26worktree-agent-a7ef607b7ee1d6c74
branch-rename.ts6.3 KB · 197 lines
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
/**
 * Block J24 — Branch rename.
 *
 * Pure helpers for validating + planning a branch rename. The actual git
 * work + the DB cascades (pull_requests, branch_protection, merge_queue,
 * default branch) live in the route — this file has no IO and is safe to
 * unit test.
 *
 * Validation follows `git-check-ref-format(1)`. Rules (strict):
 *
 *   - must be non-empty, at most `MAX_BRANCH_NAME_LENGTH` chars
 *   - can't start or end with `/`
 *   - can't contain `//`
 *   - can't contain `..`, `@{`, a bare `@`, or any of ``` ~^:?*[\ ```
 *   - can't contain ASCII control chars (0x00–0x1F, DEL)
 *   - can't start with `-` or `.`
 *   - can't end with `.` or `.lock`
 *   - each slash-separated component must be non-empty, can't begin or end
 *     with `.`, and can't end with `.lock`
 *
 * These mirror what `git check-ref-format --branch` rejects. We do NOT
 * allow a single `@` (git's own rule).
 */

export const MAX_BRANCH_NAME_LENGTH = 250;

export type ValidateBranchResult =
  | { ok: true }
  | { ok: false; reason: BranchValidationReason };

export type BranchValidationReason =
  | "not_string"
  | "empty"
  | "too_long"
  | "slash_boundary"
  | "leading_dash"
  | "dot_boundary"
  | "consecutive_slashes"
  | "double_dot"
  | "at_brace"
  | "only_at"
  | "lock_suffix"
  | "forbidden_char"
  | "control_char"
  | "empty_component"
  | "dot_component"
  | "lock_component";

const FORBIDDEN_RE = /[\s~^:?*\[\\\x7f]/;
const CONTROL_RE = /[\x00-\x1f]/;

export function validateBranchName(name: unknown): ValidateBranchResult {
  if (typeof name !== "string") return { ok: false, reason: "not_string" };
  const n = name;
  if (n.length === 0) return { ok: false, reason: "empty" };
  if (n.length > MAX_BRANCH_NAME_LENGTH)
    return { ok: false, reason: "too_long" };
  if (n === "@") return { ok: false, reason: "only_at" };
  if (n.startsWith("/") || n.endsWith("/"))
    return { ok: false, reason: "slash_boundary" };
  if (n.startsWith("-")) return { ok: false, reason: "leading_dash" };
  if (n.startsWith(".") || n.endsWith("."))
    return { ok: false, reason: "dot_boundary" };
  if (n.includes("//")) return { ok: false, reason: "consecutive_slashes" };
  if (n.includes("..")) return { ok: false, reason: "double_dot" };
  if (n.includes("@{")) return { ok: false, reason: "at_brace" };
  if (n.endsWith(".lock")) return { ok: false, reason: "lock_suffix" };
  if (CONTROL_RE.test(n)) return { ok: false, reason: "control_char" };
  if (FORBIDDEN_RE.test(n)) return { ok: false, reason: "forbidden_char" };

  const parts = n.split("/");
  for (const p of parts) {
    if (p.length === 0) return { ok: false, reason: "empty_component" };
    if (p.startsWith(".") || p.endsWith("."))
      return { ok: false, reason: "dot_component" };
    if (p.endsWith(".lock")) return { ok: false, reason: "lock_component" };
  }
  return { ok: true };
}

export function branchValidationMessage(
  r: BranchValidationReason
): string {
  switch (r) {
    case "not_string":
    case "empty":
      return "Branch name is required.";
    case "too_long":
      return `Branch name must be ${MAX_BRANCH_NAME_LENGTH} characters or fewer.`;
    case "slash_boundary":
      return "Branch name cannot start or end with '/'.";
    case "leading_dash":
      return "Branch name cannot start with '-'.";
    case "dot_boundary":
      return "Branch name cannot start or end with '.'.";
    case "consecutive_slashes":
      return "Branch name cannot contain '//'.";
    case "double_dot":
      return "Branch name cannot contain '..'.";
    case "at_brace":
      return "Branch name cannot contain '@{'.";
    case "only_at":
      return "Branch name cannot be '@'.";
    case "lock_suffix":
    case "lock_component":
      return "Branch name components cannot end with '.lock'.";
    case "forbidden_char":
      return "Branch name cannot contain whitespace or any of ~ ^ : ? * [ \\.";
    case "control_char":
      return "Branch name cannot contain control characters.";
    case "empty_component":
      return "Branch name cannot contain an empty path component.";
    case "dot_component":
      return "Branch name components cannot start or end with '.'.";
  }
}

export interface PlanRenameInput {
  from: string;
  to: string;
  existingBranches: readonly string[];
  defaultBranch: string | null;
}

export type PlanRenameResult =
  | {
      ok: true;
      from: string;
      to: string;
      /** True when renaming the repo's default branch. */
      updatesDefault: boolean;
    }
  | {
      ok: false;
      reason:
        | "same_name"
        | "invalid_from"
        | "invalid_to"
        | "from_missing"
        | "to_exists";
      detail?: BranchValidationReason;
    };

/**
 * Compute whether `from → to` is a legal rename given the current state.
 * Never performs IO. Case-sensitivity matches git (refs are
 * case-sensitive, so "Main" and "main" are different branches).
 */
export function planRename(input: PlanRenameInput): PlanRenameResult {
  const { from, to, existingBranches, defaultBranch } = input;

  const vFrom = validateBranchName(from);
  if (!vFrom.ok)
    return { ok: false, reason: "invalid_from", detail: vFrom.reason };
  const vTo = validateBranchName(to);
  if (!vTo.ok)
    return { ok: false, reason: "invalid_to", detail: vTo.reason };

  if (from === to) return { ok: false, reason: "same_name" };

  const existing = new Set(existingBranches);
  if (!existing.has(from)) return { ok: false, reason: "from_missing" };
  if (existing.has(to)) return { ok: false, reason: "to_exists" };

  return {
    ok: true,
    from,
    to,
    updatesDefault: defaultBranch === from,
  };
}

/**
 * Given a glob/exact branch-protection pattern and the rename, decide
 * whether the pattern itself should be updated. Only exact (non-glob)
 * matches are rewritten — globs like `release/*` are left alone because
 * the rename doesn't change how they match the namespace.
 */
export function shouldRewriteProtectionPattern(
  pattern: string,
  from: string
): boolean {
  if (pattern !== from) return false;
  // Conservative: only exact matches, no glob characters present.
  if (/[*?\[]/.test(pattern)) return false;
  return true;
}

export const __internal = {
  MAX_BRANCH_NAME_LENGTH,
  FORBIDDEN_RE,
  CONTROL_RE,
  validateBranchName,
  branchValidationMessage,
  planRename,
  shouldRewriteProtectionPattern,
};