CodeIssuesDiscussionsWikiPull RequestsProjectsCommitsActionsReleasesContributorsPulse● GatesSecuritySettingsDeploymentsPipelineInsightsAgents✨ Explain✨ Ask AI✨ Workspace✨ Spec✨ Tests▓ Debt Map✨ NL Search🏛 Archaeology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 | /**
* Block E6 — Required status checks matrix tests.
*
* Covers the pure protection-evaluator path (no DB) + route auth smoke.
*/
import { describe, it, expect } from "bun:test";
import app from "../app";
import { evaluateProtection } from "../lib/branch-protection";
import type { BranchProtection } from "../db/schema";
function rule(overrides: Partial<BranchProtection> = {}): BranchProtection {
return {
id: "rule-1",
repositoryId: "repo-1",
pattern: "main",
requirePullRequest: true,
requireGreenGates: true,
requireAiApproval: false,
requireHumanReview: false,
requiredApprovals: 0,
allowForcePush: false,
allowDeletion: false,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
...overrides,
} as BranchProtection;
}
describe("evaluateProtection — required checks matrix", () => {
const green = {
aiApproved: true,
humanApprovalCount: 1,
gateResultGreen: true,
hasFailedGates: false,
};
it("allows when no required checks are configured", () => {
const d = evaluateProtection(rule(), green, []);
expect(d.allowed).toBe(true);
expect(d.reasons.length).toBe(0);
expect(d.missingChecks).toBeUndefined();
});
it("allows when all required checks are in passingCheckNames", () => {
const d = evaluateProtection(
rule(),
{ ...green, passingCheckNames: ["GateTest", "AI Review", "CI"] },
["GateTest", "AI Review"]
);
expect(d.allowed).toBe(true);
expect(d.missingChecks).toBeUndefined();
});
it("blocks when a required check is missing", () => {
const d = evaluateProtection(
rule(),
{ ...green, passingCheckNames: ["GateTest"] },
["GateTest", "AI Review"]
);
expect(d.allowed).toBe(false);
expect(d.missingChecks).toEqual(["AI Review"]);
expect(d.reasons.join(" ")).toContain("AI Review");
});
it("blocks when passingCheckNames is empty but checks are required", () => {
const d = evaluateProtection(
rule(),
{ ...green, passingCheckNames: [] },
["GateTest"]
);
expect(d.allowed).toBe(false);
expect(d.missingChecks).toEqual(["GateTest"]);
});
it("still reports other failures alongside missing checks", () => {
const d = evaluateProtection(
rule({ requireAiApproval: true, requiredApprovals: 2 }),
{
aiApproved: false,
humanApprovalCount: 0,
gateResultGreen: true,
hasFailedGates: false,
passingCheckNames: [],
},
["CI"]
);
expect(d.allowed).toBe(false);
// 3 reasons: AI approval, required approvals, missing check
expect(d.reasons.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(3);
expect(d.missingChecks).toEqual(["CI"]);
});
});
describe("required-checks — route smoke", () => {
it("GET protection/:id/checks without auth → 302 /login", async () => {
const res = await app.request(
"/any/repo/gates/protection/abc/checks"
);
expect(res.status).toBe(302);
const loc = res.headers.get("location") || "";
expect(loc.startsWith("/login")).toBe(true);
});
it("POST protection/:id/checks without auth → 302 /login", async () => {
const res = await app.request(
"/any/repo/gates/protection/abc/checks",
{
method: "POST",
body: new URLSearchParams({ checkName: "CI" }),
headers: { "content-type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" },
}
);
expect(res.status).toBe(302);
const loc = res.headers.get("location") || "";
expect(loc.startsWith("/login")).toBe(true);
});
it("POST protection/:id/checks/:cid/delete without auth → 302 /login", async () => {
const res = await app.request(
"/any/repo/gates/protection/abc/checks/xyz/delete",
{ method: "POST" }
);
expect(res.status).toBe(302);
const loc = res.headers.get("location") || "";
expect(loc.startsWith("/login")).toBe(true);
});
});
|